| تبليغات | X |
|
شطرنج مانند عشق و موسیقی این قدرت را دارد که شادی بخش روح انسان بشود |
The Most Important Novelty of Chess Informant 96
Sasa Velickovic
Of particular interest to our readers is the high quality game Van Wely – Radjabov, where Van Wely surprised his opponent in a well-known position by playing 13.Ne6. In similar positions, White’s knight would only jump to the e6-square after Black played h6.
Van Wely probably estimated in his home analyses that it would be better to give Radjabov the chance to go wrong, and the game continuation proved him right. With its many subtle changes, it is no wonder that this was selected among the ten best games of the previous volume. I’m sure we will soon learn if Black has better possibilities.
Van Wely 2648 – T.Radjabov 2704
Khanty-Mansiysk (m/1) 2005 — 95/405
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.b4 Nh5 10.Re1 f5 11.Ng5 Nf6 12.f3 Kh8
13.Ne6!? [a novelty; 13.Be3 see 89/488] Be6 14.de6 fe4 15.fe4 Nc6 16.Nd5 Ne4 [16...Ng8 17.b5 Nd4 18.e7 Ne7 19.Bg5 Nd5 20.Bd8 Nc3 21.Qd3 Nce2 22.Re2 Ne2 23.Qe2 Rad8 24.Qe3 and White is superior] 17.Bf3 Nf6 [17...Ng5 18.Bg5 (18.b5!? Nf3 19.gf3; 18.Bg4!?) Qg5 19.e7 Ne7 20.Nc7 e4 21.Re4 Rf3 22.Na8] 18.b5 Nd5?! [18...Ne7 19.Nf6 Rf6 20.Bb7 Rb8 21.Bd5 and White is superior; 21.Be4 and White is superior] 19.bc6 Nb6 [19...e4 20.cb7 Rb8 21.cd5 ef3 22.gf3 Ba1 (22...Be5 23.Rb1 Qh4 24.Re5 de5 25.Be3 and White is winning) 23.e7 Qe8 24.ef8Q Qf8 25.Qa4 and White is winning; 19...Nc3 20.cb7 Rb8 21.Qc2 e4 22.Be4 and White is superior] 20.cb7 Rb8 21.c5! e4 [21...dc5 22.Qd8 Rfd8 23.e7 Re8 24.Bg5 h6 25.Bc6] 22.Re4 dc5 23.Qd8 Rfd8
24.Bg5! Re8 [24...Ba1 25.Bd8 Rd8 26.e7 Re8 27.Re2 and White is winning] 25.Rd1 Bd4 26.Red4 cd4 27.e7 [27.Bf6 Kg8 28.Rd4 Re6 29.Rd8 Re8 30.Re8 Re8 31.Bc6 Rb8 32.Be5 Nd7 33.Bc7 Kf7 34.Kf2! and White is winning] h6 28.Bf6 [28.Bc6 hg5 29.Be8 Nd5 30.Rd4 Ne7 31.Rd7! Re8 32.Re7 and White is winning] Kg8 29.Rd4 Kf7 30.Rd8! (and White is winning) Nd7 [30...Kf6 31.Re8 Re8 32.Bc6 Rb8 33.e8Q Re8 34.Be8] 31.Bh4 g5 32.Rd7 Ke6 33.Bg4 Kf6 34.Be1 Rb7 35.Bc3 Kg6 36.Bf3 Rb1 37.Kf2 Rc1 38.Rc7 Kf5 39.Bh5 Rc2 40.Kf3 1-0 [Van Wely]
Bareev 2675 – Sergey Karjakin 2658
Beer-Sheva 2005 — 95/328
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Nf3 Nbd7 6.Bd3 dc4 7.Bc4 b5 8.Bd3 a6 9.e4 c5 10.e5 cd4 11.Nb5 ab5 12.ef6 gf6 13.0-0 Qb6 14.Qe2 Ba6 15.a4 Nc5 [15...ba4 16.Ra4 Nc5 17.Ba6 Na4 18.Bb5 Ke7 19.Nd4 Qd4 20.Rd1 Qa7 21.Bf4 Rd8 22.Rd8 Kd8 23.Qd3 and White is winning; 15...Rd8 16.Bd2 and White is superior; 15...Bc5 16.a5 Qb8 17.Bd2 and White is superior] 16.ab5 Bb7 17.Ra8 Ba8
18.Nd4! [a novelty; 18.Bf4 see 61/486] Qd6 19.b6! Nd3 [19...Qd4 20.Bb5 Ke7 21.Be3 Qd5 22.f3 Qe5 23.Rd1 and White is winning] 20.Qd3 Qb6 21.Be3 [21.Qc4!? Bc5 22.Be3 with initiative] Qb7 22.f3 [22.Nf3? Rg8 with attack] Be7 23.Bh6 [23.Rc1! 0-0 24.Nc6 Re8 25.Rc4 f5 26.b4 Bf6 27.b5 Bg7 28.Rc1 and White is superior] Bf8 24.Be3 Be7 25.Bh6 Bf8 26.Nf5!? Qd5! [26...ef5 27.Qf5! Qd5 (27...Qb6 28.Kh1 Qe6 29.Qb5 and White is winning; 27...Be7 28.Bg7 Rg8 29.Qh7 and White is superior) 28.Qc8 Qd8 29.Rc1 Qc8 30.Rc8 Kd7 31.Rf8 Rf8 32.Bf8 and White is superior] 27.Qd5 [27.Ng7 Kd7 with counterplay, with the idea Bc5] Bd5 28.Bf8 Rf8 29.Ne3 (and White is slightly better) Bc6 30.Rc1 Bd7 31.Rc7 Ke7 32.Rb7! [with the idea Nc4] Rc8 [32...Kd6 33.b4 and White is slightly better] 33.b3 Kd8! 34.Ng4 Ke7 35.Nf6 Kf6 36.Rd7 [with the idea Rd3] Rc3! [R 6/f] 37.Rb7 h5 38.h4 Kg6 39.b4 Rb3 40.Rb8 Rb2 41.b5 Kg7 42.b6 e5 43.b7! f5 44.Kf1 e4 45.Ke1 Kh7? [45...Rb6 equal] 46.Kd1? [46.Rf8 Rb7 47.Rf5 ef3 48.Rh5 Kg6 49.Rg5 Kf6 50.g3 and White is winning] Kg7 47.Kc1 Rb6 48.Kd2 Rb5 49.Kc3 [49.Ke3 Rb4 only move, equal] Rb6 50.Kd4 Rb5 (only move) 51.Kc4 Rb1 52.Kd5 e3 (only move) 53.Re8 Rb7 54.Re3 Rb2 55.Ke5 Rg2 56.Kf5 Rg3 57.Ra3 [better is 57.Kf4] Kh6 58.Kf4 Rh3
½-½ [Sergey Karjakin]Predojevic 2558 – E.Romanov 2479
Istanbul 2005 — 95/115
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.Nc3 a6 4.d4 cd4 5.Nd4 Qc7 6.Bd3 Nf6 7.Qe2 Bd6
8.Ndb5! [a novelty; 8.Nf3 see 94/117; 8.g4 see 94/118] ab5 9.Nb5 Qa5 [9...Bb4?? 10.c3 and White is winning; 9...Qb6 10.Nd6 Qd6 11.e5 Qe7 12.ef6 Qf6 13.0-0 0-0 14.c3 and White is slightly better, with the idea a4, b4 queen's side initiative] 10.Bd2 Bb4 [10...Qb6 11.e5 Be7 12.ef6 Bf6 13.0-0 0-0 14.Bb4 and White is superior] 11.Bb4 Qb4 12.c3 Qc5 [12...Qa4 13.e5 Nd5 14.Nd6 Ke7 15.Bb5 Qh4 (15...Qf4 16.g3 Qh6 17.Qc4 and White is superior) 16.g3 Qh3 17.Qc4 Nc6 (17...Qg2 18.0-0-0 Na6 19.Qh4 f6 20.c4 and White is winning) 18.Qc5 Ne5 19.Nc4 Kf6 20.Qd4 d6 21.f4 and White is superior; 12...Qa5 13.e5 Ng8 14.Nd6 Kf8 15.Nc8 Nc6 16.Nd6 Qe5 17.Qe5 Ne5 18.Be4 and White is slightly better] 13.e5
13...Ng4! [13...Nd5 14.Nd6 a) 14...Kf8 15.Qf3 a1) 15...f6 16.Qh5 Ke7 17.Qf7 Kd8 18.Qg7 Re8 19.Ne8 Ke8 20.ef6 and White is winning; a2) 15...f5 16.Bf5! ef5 17.0-0-0! Ne7 (17...g6 18.Rd5 Qc6 19.g4 Ra2 20.gf5 and White is winning; 17...Kg8 18.Qf5 Nf6 19.Qf4 h6 20.ef6 and White is winning) 18.Qh5 a21) 18...g6 19.Qh6 Kg8 20.Ne8 Kf7 (20...Qe5 21.Rhe1 and White is winning) 21.Qg7 Ke8 22.Qh8 Kf7 23.Rd6 Ra6 24.Rf6 and White is winning; a22) 18...Ng6 19.Qf5 Ke7 20.Qg5 Ke6 21.g3!! Ra2 (21...Qf2 22.Rhf1 and White is winning; 21...Rf8 22.f4 Rf4 23.gf4 Qe3 24.Kb1 Qf4 25.Qg2 and White is winning; 21...Ne5 22.Rhe1 Qd6 23.Rd6 Kd6 24.Qe5 Kc6 25.b4 d5 26.Qg7 Rd8 27.Qe7 Rd6 28.b5 Kc5 29.Qc7 and White is winning) 22.Qf5 Ke7 23.Qf7 Kd8 24.Qa2 Rf8 25.f4 and White is winning; a3) 15...Nf6 16.Qf4 Nc6 17.ef6 Ne5 18.fg7 Kg7 19.Qg3 and White is superior; b) 14...Ke7 15.Qh5! g6 (15...f6 16.Qf7 Kd8 17.Qg7 Re8 18.Ne8 Ke8 19.Bh7 and White is winning) 16.Bg6!! fg6 17.Qh4 Kf8 18.Rd1! (with the idea Rd5) Ra4 19.Qa4 Kg7 20.0-0 and White is superior] 14.Qg4?! [14.Nd6?! Kf8! (14...Ke7 15.Qg4 Qe5 16.Ne4 and White is superior) 15.Qg4 Qe5 16.Ne4 f5 17.Qg5 Nc6 18.f4 Qd5 19.Nf2 Ra2 and Black is superior; 14.f4! a) 14...Nh6 15.b4 Qc6 16.Be4 Qb6 17.Nd6 Kd8 (17...Ke7 18.a4 and White is superior; 17...Kf8 18.Nc8 Qc7 19.Nd6 Qc3 20.Kf2 Qd4 21.Kg3 Ra3 22.Bf3 and White is superior) 18.a4 with the idea a5 and White is superior; b) 14...f5 b1) 15.Nd6 Kf8 16.h3 Nh6 17.g4 Nf7 18.Nc8 Qc8 19.gf5 ef5 20.Bf5 with compensation; b2) 15.h3 Nh6 16.b4 Qb6 (16...Qc6 17.Qh5 Kf8 18.Nd6 Qc3 19.Ke2 g6 20.Qh6 Kg8 21.Ne8 and White is winning) 17.Nd6 (17.Qh5 Ke7 18.Nd6 Qe3 19.Be2 Qg3) Ke7 18.Nc4 Qc7 19.0-0 (with the idea Qh5) b5 20.Nd6 Qc3 21.Rac1 Qd4 22.Kh1 and White is superior; 19...Nf7 unclear; b3) 15.b4! Qc6 (15...Qb6 16.Nd6 Ke7 17.Bf5!) 16.h3 Nf6 (16...Nh6 17.Qh5 Kf8 18.Nd6 Qc3 19.Ke2 g6 20.Qh6 and White is winning) 17.ef6 gf6 18.Qh5 Kf8 19.0-0 and White is superior; c) 14...h5! c1) 15.h3 Ne3 16.Nd6 Ke7 17.Qf2 c11) 17...Na6 18.Ba6 Ra6 19.Ke2 Rb6 20.b3 and White is winning; c12) 17...Qb6 18.Qh4 f6 19.Qg3 g5 20.Nc8 (20.Ne4 Qb2 21.ef6 Kd8) Rc8 21.ef6 Kf7 22.Bg6!; c13) 17...Ra5! 18.b4 Qc3 19.Ke2 Nc2 20.ba5 Na1 21.Qe1 Qe1 22.Re1 Nc6 23.Ra1 Na5 24.Ke3 Nc6 25.h4 with compensation; c2) 15.b4 Qb6 16.Nd6 Ke7 17.Nc4 Qc6 18.h3 Nh6 19.0-0 with attack] Qe5 15.Kd2! [15.Kf1 0-0 16.h4 (16.Re1 Qc5 17.h4 Ra2 18.Rh3 f5!) f5 17.Qd4 Nc6 18.Qe5 Ne5 19.Be2 and White is slightly better; 15.Qe2 Qe2 16.Ke2 Ke7 17.a4 (with the idea a5, b4) Nc6 18.b4 b6! 19.f4 Ba6 20.Kd2 and White is slightly better] 0-0 16.Qh4 [16.f4 Qf6! and White is slightly better] g6 [16...h6 17.Rhe1 Qg5 18.Qg5 hg5 19.Nd6 and White is superior; 16...f5 17.Rhe1 Qc5 18.Qd4 Qd4 19.cd4 and White is superior] 17.f4 [better is 17.Rhe1 Qg7 18.Nd6 Nc6 19.f4 with initiative] Qg7 [17...Qd5! 18.Qg5 (18.c4? Qg2 19.Kc3 Ra2! and Black is superior; 18.g4 Ra2 19.Ra2 Qa2 and Black is superior) Qc6 (18...Qg5 19.fg5 d5 20.Rhf1 Nc6 21.a3 Bd7 22.Rf6 and White is slightly better) 19.Nd4 Qb6 20.Kc2 Nc6 21.Qf6 d6 22.Rhe1 and White is slightly better] 18.g4 (with attack) Ra4 [18...d5?! 19.f5! g5 20.Qh5 Nd7 (20...e5 21.f6 and White is winning) 21.h4 ef5 22.hg5 and White is superior] 19.Rhf1 Nc6 [19...Rf4? 20.Rf4 g5 21.Qh7 and White is winning] 20.b3 time [better is 20.Nd6 e5 21.f5 g5 22.f6 gh4 23.fg7 Kg7 24.Be4 Ne7 25.c4 and White is superior] Ra5 21.a4 [21.b4 Ra4 22.Nd6 Ra3! with counterplay, weak point c3; 21.Nd6 Rd5!] f6! [21...d5 22.f5 g5 (22...ef5 23.gf5 g5 24.f6 gh4 25.fg7 Kg7 26.b4 Ra8 27.Nc7 Rb8 28.Nd5 and White is superior) 23.Qg3 e5 (23...f6 24.fe6 Be6 25.Rae1 Ne5 26.h3 with the idea Nd4) 24.f6 Qh6 25.b4 Ra8 26.Nc7 Be6 27.Na8 and White is superior] 22.Rae1 d5 23.g5! [23.Qg3? (with the idea g5) e5!; 23.f5 g5 24.Qg3 e5 and Black is superior] Bd7 [23...fg5 24.fg5 e5 25.Qh6! (25.Rf8 Qf8 26.Rf1 Qe7) Qh6 26.gh6 Be6 27.Nd6 Ra7 28.Bb5 Rf1 29.Rf1 and White is slightly better] 24.Qg3 Nd8?! [24...fg5 25.fg5 (25.Qg5 d4 26.c4 Nb4) e5 26.Nd6!? with initiative with the idea 26...Raa8 27.Nb7 Be6 28.Nc5 Qe7 29.b4, with the idea 26...Qe7 27.Rf8 Qf8 28.Re5! Ne5 29.Qe5 Bc6 (29...Qf3 30.Qe7 Qf4 31.Kc2 Qh2 32.Kb1 Qg1 33.Kb2 Qf2 34.Bc2 Bh3 35.Qd8 Qf8 36.Qa5 Qd6 37.Qa8 and White is winning) 30.Ne4! and White is superior; RR 30.Bf5! and White is winning] 25.Nd4 Ra8 26.h4 (and White is superior) Rc8 27.h5 f5 [27...gh5 28.Rh1 Be8 (28...fg5 29.Rh5 h6 30.fg5 Nf7 31.g6 Ng5 32.Reh1 e5 33.Rh6 ed4 34.Qg5 dc3 35.Kc1 and White is winning) 29.Ne6 Ne6 30.Re6 fg5 31.Qg5 Qg5 (31...Rf4 32.Qf4 Qg2 33.Re2 Qh1 34.Qg5 and White is winning; 31...Bg6 32.Bg6 and White is winning) 32.fg5 Rf2 33.Re2 Rf4 34.Ke3 and White is superior] 28.Qe3 Re8 29.Qe5 Qe5 30.Re5 Nf7 [30...Nc6 31.Re3 gh5 32.Rh1 and White is superior] 31.Re3 e5 [31...Nd6 32.hg6 hg6 33.Rh1 Kg7 34.Reh3 Rh8 35.Rh8 Rh8 36.Rh8 Kh8 37.Nf3 and White is superior; 31...gh5 32.Rh3 e5 33.fe5 and White is superior] 32.hg6 hg6 33.fe5 Re5 [33...Ne5 34.Rfe1 Nf7 35.Re8 Re8 36.Re8 Be8 37.Nf3 Bc6 38.Ke3 and White is superior, with the idea 38...d4 39.Nd4 Ng5 40.Nc6 bc6 41.a5 Ne6 42.a6 Nc7 43.a7 Kf7 44.Ba6 Ke6 45.Bb7 Kd6 46.a8Q Na8 47.Ba8 Kc7 48.Kf4 and White is winning; 33...Ng5 34.Rg3 and White is winning] 34.Re5 Ne5 35.Nf3! Nf7 [35...Nd3 36.Kd3 and White is superior; 35...Nf3 36.Rf3 Kf7 37.Rh3 Kg7 38.Rh4 and White is superior] 36.Re1 Re8 [36...Bc6 37.Re6 Kg7 38.Nh4 Nh8 39.Re7 and White is winning] 37.Re8 Be8 [NB 9/c] 38.Ke3 Kf8 39.Kd4 Ke7 40.Kc5! Nd6 41.a5 Kd7 [41...Ne4 42.Kb6 Kd6 (42...Kd7 43.Bb5 and White is winning; 42...Kd8 43.Kb7 Nc5 44.Kb6! Nd3 45.a6 and White is winning) 43.b4 (43.Be4 de4 44.Nd4 f4 45.Kb7 f3 46.a6 f2 47.a7 f1Q 48.a8Q Bc6! 49.Nc6 Qb5 50.Ka7 Qc5 equal) Bc6 44.Nd4 and White is winning] 42.Kd5 [42.Bb5! Nb5 43.Kb5 Kc7 (43...Kd6 44.Kb6 Bc6 45.Nd4 with the idea b4-b5 and White is winning) 44.Kc5 f4 45.Ne5 and White is winning] Bf7 43.Ke5 Bb3 44.Kf6 Ne4 45.Kg6 [45.Be4? fe4 46.Nd4 Bd1! (46...e3?? 47.Nb3 and White is winning; 46...Bc4 47.Nc2 and White is winning) 47.Kg6 e3 a) 48.Kh7 e2 49.Nf3 Kc6 50.g6 Kb5 51.g7 Bb3 52.g8Q (52.Nd4 Ka4 53.Nb3?? e1Q 54.g8Q Qh1 55.Kg7 Qg2 56.Kf8 Qg8 57.Kg8 Kb3 58.Kf7 Kc3 59.Ke6 Kb4 60.Kd5 Ka5 and Black is winning; 53.Ne2 equal) Bg8 53.Kg8 Ka5 54.Kf7 Kb5 55.Ke6 Kc4 56.Ke5 Kc3 57.Ke4 Kc2 58.Ke3 Kd1 59.Kd3 equal; b) 48.Kf5 e2 49.Nf3 Kc6 50.g6 b1) 50...Kb5 51.g7 Bb3 52.Nd4 Ka4 53.Ne2 (53.Nb3? e1Q 54.g8Q Qc3 equal) Ka5 54.Ke4 b5 55.Kd4 Bg8 56.Nf4 Ka4 (56...b4 57.c4 b3 58.Nd3 with the idea Kc3 and White is winning) 57.Nd5 Kb3 58.Nf6 Bf7 59.g8Q Bg8 60.Ng8 b4 61.c4 Kc2 62.Nf6 b3 63.Ne4 b2 64.Nc3 and White is winning; b2) 50...Bc2! 51.Kf6 Bg6 52.Kg6 Kc5 53.Kf5 Kc4 54.Ke5 Kc3 55.Kd6 Kb4 equal; c) 48.Kf6 e2 49.Nf3 Kd6 50.g6 Kc5 51.g7 (51.Ke5 Bb3 52.Kf4 Kc4 equal) Bb3 52.Ke5 Bg8 53.Ke4 Kc4 equal] Nc3 46.Bf5 Kd6 47.Nd2! (and White is winning) Bd5 48.Kf6 Ne2 49.Ne4 Kc6 50.Ke5 Nc1 51.Nc3 [51.Bd7 Kd7 52.Kd5 Ne2 53.Kc5 Kc7 54.Nf6 and White is winning] Bf7 52.Be4 Kc7 53.Nb5 Kb8 54.Nd6 Bh5 55.Nb7 Nb3 56.Bd5 Nd2 57.Nd8 [57.Nc5 and White is winning] Ka7 58.Kf4 Bg6 59.Ke3 Nf1 60.Kd4 Ng3 61.Kc5 Ka6
62.Nc6?? [62.Kb4 and White is winning; 62.Nb7 and White is winning] Ne4 63.Be4 Be4 equal [NB 3/g2] 64.Kd6 Kb5 65.Kc7 Ka6 [65...Bc6?? 66.a6 and White is winning] 66.Kd6 Kb5 67.Ne7 Ka5 [NB 3/e] 68.Ke5 Bh7 69.Kf6 Kb6 70.Ng6 Bg8 71.Nf8 Kc7? [71...Kc6! 72.Ke7 Kd5 73.g6 Ke5 74.Nd7 Kf5 75.g7 Be6 76.Kf8 Kg6 77.Ne5 Kf6 equal] 72.Ke7 (and White is winning) Kc6 73.g6 Kd5 74.Nd7! Kd4 [74...Ke4 75.Kf6 Kf4 (75...Bb3 76.Nc5; 75...Ba2 76.Ne5 Kf4 77.Nf7 Bb1 78.g7 Bh7 79.Nd6 Bg8 80.Ke7 Kg5 81.Kf8 Bh7 82.Kf7 Bg6 83.Kg8) 76.Ne5 Bb3 77.Nf7 Bc2 78.g7 Bh7 79.Nd6 Bg8 80.Ke7 Kg5 81.Kf8 Bh7 82.Kf7 Bg6 (82...Bb1 83.g8Q) 83.Kg8 Bd3 84.Nf7 Kf6 85.Kh8] 75.Kf6! Bb3 [75...Kd5 76.Ne5 with the idea Nf7, Kg7] 76.Ne5 Bc2 77.g7 Bh7 78.Nf3 Ke3 79.Ng5 Bg8 80.Ke7 [80...Kf4 81.Kf8 Bb3 82.Nf7] 1-0 [Predojevic, Iv.Markovic]
Iv.Sokolov 2696 – Harikrishna 2673
Hoogeveen 2005 — 95/(282)
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 dc4 5.a4 Bf5 6.Ne5 Nbd7 7.Nc4 Qc7 8.g3 e5 9.de5 Ne5 10.Bf4 Nfd7 11.Bg2 g5 12.Be5 Ne5 13.Qd4 f6 14.0-0-0
14...Rd8! [a novelty; 14...Be7 see 95/(282)] 15.Qe3 Be7 16.Rd8 Kd8 17.Ne5 Qe5 18.Qa7 Ba3 19.Rd1 Kc8 20.Qd4 Qd4 21.Rd4 Bc5 22.Rd2 Be6 with compensation
Ulibin 2536 – E.Berg 2531
Santa Cruz de La Palma 2005 — 95/(195)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.c3 c5 6.Bd3 Nc6 7.Ne2 cd4 8.cd4 f6 9.ef6 Nf6 10.Nf3 Bd6 11.0-0 Qc7 12.Bg5 0-0 13.Bh4 Nh5 14.Qc2 h6 15.Bg6 Rf3 16.gf3 Bh2 17.Kh1 Nf4 18.Ng3
18...e5! [a novelty; 18...Qb6 see 86/272] 19.Kh2 Qd6 20.Bh7 Kh8 21.de5 Ne5 with compensation.
R.Ponomariov 2704 – Bareev 2675
Khanty-Mansiysk (m/2) 2005 — 95/205
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be3 a6 8.Qd2 b5 9.a3 Bb7 10.g3
10...Qa5! [a novelty; 10...c4; 10...g6; 10...Qb6] 11.Ra2!? [11.a4?! Be7 (11...b4 12.Ne2) 12.Bg2 Nb6 13.b3 cd4 14.Nd4 Bb4 15.Nc6 Bc6 16.Bd4 Rc8 17.0-0 Bd7 18.Rf3 (18.ab5 Bc3 19.Ra5 Bd2 20.Ra6 Bb5 21.Rb6 Bf1 22.Bf1 0-0) ba4 with counterplay; 11.Rb1 b4 12.ab4 Qb4 13.Bg2 Nb6 14.b3 Rc8 with counterplay; 11.Bg2 b4 12.Ne2 cd4 with the idea13.Ned4 ba3 14.c3 ab2 15.Qb2 Qc7 16.0-0 Bc5] Rc8 [11...g5!? 12.Bh3 (12.Ng5 cd4 13.Bd4 Nd4 14.Qd4 Bc5 15.Qd3 d4 16.b4 Bb4 17.ab4 Qb4 with initiative) gf4 (12...h5 13.Ng5 cd4 14.Bd4 Nd4 15.Qd4 Bc5 16.Qd3 d4 17.Be6 and White is winning) 13.gf4 Rg8 14.f5 (14.Rg1 Rg1 15.Bg1 Bh6 unclear, weak point Ra2) Nce5 15.de5 d4 16.fe6 fe6 17.Be6 Bf3 18.Qf2 Ne5 19.Bg8 Bh1 20.Qf5 Bg7 21.Bh6 Bh6 22.Qe5 Kf8 23.Be6 Qd8 24.Nd5 Qh4 25.Kf1 Bd5 26.Bd5 Rd8 27.Qh8 Ke7 28.Qe5 Kf8 equal; 11...Qc7 12.Bg2 Nb6 (12...b4 13.ab4 cd4 14.Nd4 Bb4 15.0-0 Nb6 16.Nc6 Qc6 17.Bd4 Nc4 18.Qf2 and White is superior) 13.b3 b4 14.Ne2 (14.ab4 cd4 15.Nd4 Bb4 16.0-0 Rc8 17.Nc6 Qc6 18.Qf2 Bc3 19.Bb6 0-0 20.Bd4 Rc7 with counterplay) c4 (14...cd4 15.Ned4 ba3 16.f5 ef5 17.0-0 Nd4 18.Nd4 g6 19.e6 Bg7 20.ef7 Kf7 21.g4 with initiative) 15.a4 Na5 16.Qd1 0-0-0 17.0-0 g6 unclear] 12.Bg2 b4 [12...Qb6 13.Ne2; 12...Nb6 13.b3 cd4 14.Nd4 Nd7 (14...Ne5 15.b4 Nbc4 16.ba5 Nd2 17.Bd2 Nc4 18.Nb1 Bc5 19.Nb3 Ba7 20.c3 0-0 21.a4 ba4 22.Ra4 and White is superior) 15.Nc6 Rc6 16.b4 Qc7 17.Ne2 Nb6 18.Bb6 Qb6 19.Nd4 Rc4 20.c3 Be7 21.Bf1 Rc7 22.Bd3 0-0 23.0-0 Rfc8 24.Rf3 f6 with counterplay] 13.ab4 Qb4 14.0-0 cd4?! [14...Nb6! 15.Qf2 (15.b3 cd4 16.Nd4 Bc5 17.Nc6 Rc6 with counterplay, weak point Nc3) Nc4 16.Ra4 Qb2! 17.Rb1 Qc3 (17...cd4 18.Rb2 de3 19.Qe1 Nb2 20.Qb1 Na4 21.Qb7 and White is winning) 18.Rb3 Qb3 19.cb3 Ne3 20.Qe3 a) 20...Nd4 21.Nd4 cd4 22.Qd2 Be7 (22...Bc5 23.Bf1 d3 24.Kg2 Be3 25.Qb4 Rb8 26.h4 with the idea 26...d2 27.Ba6 d1Q 28.Bb5 Kd8 29.Qd6 Kc8 30.Qd7#) 23.Bf1 Rc3 24.b4 0-0 25.Qd4 Rfc8 26.Qb6 with initiative; b) 20...cd4 21.Qd2 b1) 21...a5 22.f5! (22.Bf1 Bb4 23.Qd1 0-0 24.Bd3 h6 unclear) ef5 23.Qg5 with initiative; b2) 21...Be7 22.Bf1 (22.Bh3 0-0 23.f5 f6) 0-0 23.b4 (23.Ba6 Ba6 24.Ra6 Nb4 25.Ra5 Rc2 26.Qd4 Rfc8 and Black is superior) Rb8 24.Nd4 Nd4 25.Qd4 Bc6 26.Ra6 Rb4 27.Qf2 Rc8 28.Rb6 equal] 15.Nd4 Nd4 16.Bd4 Bc5 17.Rd1 Bd4 18.Qd4 Rc4 19.Qf2! [19.Qa7 a) 19...Qc5 20.Qc5 Nc5 21.Bf1 (21.Ra5 Nd7 22.Bf1 Rb4 23.Ba6 Ba6 24.Ra6 Rb2 25.Ra8 Rb8 26.Rb8 Nb8) Rb4 22.Ne2 and White is slightly better; b) 19...Ke7 20.Bf1 Qc5 21.Qc5 Rc5 22.Ba6 Ba6 23.Ra6 Rb8 with compensation] 0-0 20.Bf1 Rc7 21.Qd4 a5? [21...Qe7 22.Ba6 Ba6 23.Ra6 Rb8 24.Rd6! and White is slightly better, with the idea 24...Qe8 25.Ra1 Rc4 26.Qa7! and White is superior]
22.Qb4! ab4 23.Nb5 Rc2 24.Nd4 (and White is superior) Rcc8 [24...Rc7 25.Ra7 Ra8 26.Ra8 Ba8 27.Ra1 Bb7 28.Nb5! Rc2 29.Ra7 Bc8 30.Nd6 and White is superior] 25.Ra7 Nc5 26.Rc1 Ba8 27.Ba6! [27.Ra8 Ra8 28.Rc5 Ra2 with counterplay] Na6 28.Rc8 Rc8 29.Ra6 [weak point Ba8] g5 [R 9/i] 30.b3! [30.fg5 Bb7 31.Rb6 Rc4! 32.Nb5 Bc6 33.Nd6 Rc1 34.Kf2 d4 with counterplay, passed pawn d] gf4 31.gf4 Bb7 32.Rb6 Rc7 33.Kf2 Bc8 34.Rc6! (and White is winning) Rc6 35.Nc6 Bb7 [35...Kf8 36.Ke3 Bb7 37.Nb4 Ke7 38.Kd4 Kd7 39.Kc5 Kc7 40.Nc2 Ba6 41.Nd4 Bd3 42.b4 Kb7 (42...Bg6 43.Nb5 Kb7 44.Nd6 Kc7 45.b5 h6 46.b6 Kb8 47.h3 Bh5 48.f5 Ka8 49.fe6 fe6 50.Nb5 Kb7 51.Nd4 Bf7 52.Nc6) 43.Nc6 (43.b5) Kc7 44.Ne7 and White is winning, with the idea Ng8-f6-e8-d6, b5] 36.Nb4 d4!? 37.Nc2 d3 38.Nb4 d2 39.Ke2 Kg7 40.Kd2 Kg6 41.Ke3 Kf5 42.Nd3 Bc6 43.b4 Kg4 44.Nf2 Kf5 45.h3!? [45.Nd1 Kg4 46.Nc3 Kh3 47.b5 Ba8 48.Ne4 h5 (48...Kh2 49.Nf6 h6 50.Ng4 and White is winning) 49.Ng5 Kh2 50.Kf2 and White is winning] h5 46.h4 Ba4 47.Kf3 Bc6 48.Kg3 Ba4 49.Nd3 Bc6 50.Ne1 f6 51.Nf3 fe5 52.Ne5 Ba4 53.Nc4 Kf6 54.Kf3 Bb5 [54...Bc6 55.Ke3 Ba4 56.Nd6 e5 57.Ne4 Kf5 58.Ng3 Kg4 59.f5 and White is winning] 55.Nd6 Bc6 56.Ke3 e5 57.b5 1-0 [R.Ponomariov]
Kobese 2400 – El Gindy 2524
Lusaka 2005 — 95/(183)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bc4 e6 7.Be3 d5 8.ed5 ed5
9.Qe2!! [a novelty; 9.Bb5 Bd7 10.0-0 Be7 (10...Bb4) 11.Nf3 (11.Qf3; 11.Bc6; 11.Re1) Be6 12.Ng5 a6 13.Ne6 fe6 14.Bc6 bc6 15.Bd4 0-0 16.Qe2 Qd6 17.Rae1 c5] Be7! [9...dc4 10.0-0-0! Nd4 (10...Bd7 11.Nc6 bc6 12.Bc5 Be7 13.Rhe1 Ng8 14.Qc4) 11.Bd4! (11.Rd4? Qa5 12.Rd5 Qa6 and Black is winning) Be6 (11...Qe7? 12.Bf6 gf6 13.Qh5 Be6 14.Qb5 Bd7 15.Qb7 and White is winning) 12.f4 Qe7 13.Bf6 gf6 14.Rhe1 Rd8 (14...Qc5 15.g4 Bh6 16.g5 fg5 17.Qh5 and White is winning) 15.f5 Bf5 16.Qh5 Be6 (16...Rd1 17.Kd1 Be6 18.Nd5 and White is winning) 17.Qb5 Rd7 18.Nd5 Bh6 19.Kb1 Qd8 20.Nf6 Qf6 21.Qd7 Kf8 22.Qd6 a) 22...Kg8 23.Rf1 Qh4 24.Qb8 Bf8 25.Rd8 Kg7 26.Qe5 Kg6 27.Rd4 and White is winning; b) 22...Kg7 23.Rf1 Qh4 (23...Qg5 24.Rf3) 24.Qe5 Kg8 25.Rf3; c) 22...Qe7 23.Re6 fe6 24.Rf1] 10.0-0-0 0-0 11.Nf3 Be6 12.Ng5 Qa5 13.Ne6 fe6 14.Bb3 Bb4 [14...Rae8! 15.Bg5 (15.Bd2 Nd4) Kh8 16.Kb1 Nd7 17.Be7 Re7 18.f3 Nc5 unclear] 15.Nb5 a6 16.Nd4 Rae8 17.g4 with attack [El Gindy]
Sutovsky 2654 – A.Stefanova 2494
Hoogeveen 2005 — 95/259
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 0-0 9.h3 Na5 10.Bc2 c5 11.d4 Qc7 12.d5 Bd7 13.b3 Rfe8
14.Kh2! [a novelty; 14.Nbd2; 14.Qe2 see 95/(259)] g6 15.g4 h5 [15...c4 16.b4 Nb7 17.a4 a5 18.Be3 and White is slightly better] 16.g5 Nh7 [with the idea f6] 17.Rg1! c4 18.b4 Nb7 19.Nbd2 [19.a4!? a5 20.Be3 and White is slightly better] Qc8?! [better is 19...a5 20.Nf1 ab4 21.cb4 with attack, with the idea Ne3-f5, with the idea Ng3-h5] 20.Rg3 h4? [20...a5 21.Nf1 with attack] 21.Nh4 Bg5 22.Ndf3 Bf6 [22...Bc1? 23.Qc1 Qd8 24.Qh6 and White is winning] 23.Qg1! Qd8 24.Bh6! a5 [24...Kh8? 25.Rg6! fg6 26.Ng6 Kg8 27.Nge5 Ng5 28.Bg5 and White is winning; 24...Nf8 25.Ng5 and White is winning]
25.Rg6! fg6 26.Qg6 Kh8 27.Qf7?! time [27.Ng5! Ng5 28.Bg5 Bg5 29.Qh5! Kg7 30.Rg1 Rg8 only move 31.Rg5 Kf6 (31...Qg5 32.Qg5 Kf7 33.Qh5 Kf6 34.Bd1! ab4 35.Qh6 Ke7 36.Qh7) 32.Qh6 Kf7 33.Qh7 Kf6 34.f4! Qf8 (34...ab4 35.Nf5 Qf8 36.Rg8 Qg8 37.Qe7 Kg6 38.Qg5 Kf7 39.Nh6; 34...ef4 35.e5! de5 36.Rh5!) 35.Rg8 Qg8 36.fe5 de5 (36...Kg5 37.Qe7 Kh6 38.Qd7) 37.Qd7 and White is winning] Rg8 28.Rg1 Qe7 29.Ng6 Rg6 30.Qg6 (and White is superior) Rf8 (only move) 31.Nh4 [31.ba5!? Na5 32.Nh4 with attack] Be8 32.Qg4 ab4 33.cb4 Qf7 34.Bf8 Qf8 35.Nf5 Bg5?! time [35...Bd7! a) 36.Qh5!? Be8 (36...Nd8 37.Rg6 Bf5 38.ef5 and White is superior) 37.Qe2 Bg5 38.a4 and White is superior; b) 36.Qg6 Be8 37.Qg3 Bg5 (37...Bd7 38.Nh4 Be8 39.Kh1 Bg5 40.Nf5 Bd7 41.h4 see 37...Bg5) 38.Kh1 Bd7 39.h4 b1) 39...Bf4 40.Qg7 Qg7 41.Rg7 Nf8 (41...Bf5 42.Rb7 Bg4 43.Rb5 Bf3 44.Kg1 Nf6 45.Rb8 Kg7 46.b5 and White is winning) 42.Rf7! Kg8 43.Re7 and White is winning; b2) 39...Bf6 40.Qg6! b21) 40...Bf5 41.ef5 Nd8 (41...Bh4 42.f6! Nf6 43.Rg4! Bf2 44.Rg2 and White is winning) 42.a4 ba4 43.Ba4 and White is superior; b22) 40...Be8 41.Qg4 Bd7 42.Qh5! Be8 43.Qf3 Bd7 44.Rg6 and White is superior; b23) 40...Nd8!? b231) 41.a4 ba4 (41...Bf5 42.ef5 ba4 43.Ba4 and White is superior) 42.Nd6 Bh4 43.f4 (43.Nc4 Bf2 44.Ne5 Bg1 45.Nd7 Qf1! 46.Qe8 Kg7 47.Qe5 Kh6 48.Bd3! Qd3 49.Qf4 Kg7 50.Qe5 Kf7 51.Qh5 Kg7 52.Qe5 equal; 43.Qh5 Qd6 44.Qh4 Nf7 unclear) a3 44.f5 c3 45.Nc4 Be8 46.Ne5 Bf6 47.Qg3 Qh6 48.Kg2 Qd2 49.Kh1 Qh6 equal; b232) 41.Nd6 Be7! 42.Nf5 Bf5 43.ef5 (43.Qf5 Qf5 44.ef5 Nf6 45.Rd1 Nf7 unclear) Nf6 44.a3 Nf7 45.Re1 Bd8! and White is superior] 36.h4 Bf6 37.Nh6 Bg7 38.Nf5 Bf6 39.Rg3! Bd7 40.Ra3! (and White is winning) Nd8 [40...Bd8 41.Ra8 Nf6 42.Qg6 Bf5 43.Qf5] 41.Ra7 Bf5 42.Qf5 Nf7 43.Kg2! [43.Qg6!? Be7 44.Kg2! (44.Qe6?? Nh6! and Black is winning) Nf6 45.Rb7] Qg7 44.Kf1 Nf8 [44...Nh6 45.Qc8 Qg8 46.Qg8 Kg8 47.a4] 45.Bd1 Ng6 [45...c3 46.Qc8] 46.Qc8 Bd8 [46...Kh7 47.Bg4 (47.Qe8 Ngh8 48.Qb5) Nf4 48.Qd7] 47.Rf7 Qf7 48.Qd8 Kh7 49.Bg4 Qf4 50.Bf5 Kh6 51.Qd6 1-0 [Sutovsky]
Or.Perez 2439 – A.Colovic 2418
La Habana II 2005 — 95/(185)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.Be3 Be7 9.Qd2 0-0 10.0-0-0 Nbd7 11.g4 Nb6 12.h4 Rc8 13.Kb1 Qc7 14.h5 Nfd7 [14...h6? see 92/237]
15.Rh2! [a novelty; 15.g5 f5! with counterplay] Nc4 16.Bc4 Qc4 17.g5 (and White is superior) f5? 18.Na5 Qc7 19.Nd5 Bd5 20.Qd5 Kh8 21.ef5 and White is winning [Motylev]
Predojevic 2558 – M.Drasko 2528
Srbija i Crna Gora 2005 — 95/191
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bd7 6.Be2 Nge7 7.Na3 Ng6 8.h4 cd4 9.cd4 Bb4?! 10.Kf1 Ba3 [10...h6 see 90/231] 11.ba3 h6 12.Rb1 Na5
13.Bd3! [a novelty; 13.Bd2] Bc6 [13...Qc7 14.Rh3!] 14.h5 Ne7 15.Nh4 (and White is superior) Kd7 [15...0-0? 16.Bh6 (16.g4 f5 17.ef6 Rf6 18.g5 hg5 19.Bg5 Rf7 20.Ng6 and White is winning) gh6 17.Qg4 (17.Qd2 Kg7 18.Rh3 f5 19.ef6 Rf6 20.Rg3 Kf7 21.Ng6 Ng6 22.Qh6 with attack) Kh8 18.Ng6 fg6 19.hg6 Nf5 (19...Kg7 20.Rh6 Rh8 21.Qh4 and White is winning; 19...Rf2 20.Kf2 Qf8 21.Ke2 and White is winning) 20.Bf5 Rf5 21.Rh6 Kg8 22.Qh3 Kf8 23.Rh8 Ke7 24.Qh7 and White is winning; 15...Qc7! 16.Qg4 0-0-0 17.Qg7?? Bb5! 18.Bb5 Qc2 and Black is winning; 17.Rh3! and White is superior] 16.Qg4 Rg8 [16...Qf8 17.Rh3 f5 18.ef6 gf6 19.Re3 and White is superior] 17.Bh7!? [17.Rh3 and White is superior, with the idea Rf3] Rc8 18.Bg8 Qg8 19.Rh3 [19.Be3 Qh7 20.Re1 Bb5 21.Kg1 Nc4 22.Rh3 Na3 23.Rg3 and White is superior] Qh7 20.Ra1 Bb5 21.Kg1 Bd3 22.Rg3 g5 23.hg6 Ng6 24.Ng6 Bg6 25.Qh4 Rc4 26.Bh6 Nc6 27.Rd1 Ne5 28.Qf6 Nc6 29.Be3 Qh5 30.Re1 Qf5 31.Qg7 Rc2 32.Rf3 Qh5 33.Rc1 Rc1 34.Bc1 (and White is winning) Bf5 35.Bf4? [35.Be3 and White is winning] Be4! with counterplay [35...Qg6 36.Qf8 Nd4 37.Qd6 Ke8 38.Qb8 Ke7 39.Bd6 Kf6 40.Be5 and White is winning] 36.Rg3 Qd1 37.Kh2 Qh5 38.Rh3 Qf5? [38...Qg6! 39.Qg6 Bg6 40.Be3 (40.Be5 Ke7 41.Rf3 Bf5 with counterplay, with the idea f6) Bb1 with counterplay] 39.Bg3 (and White is winning) Qg6 40.Qf8 e5 [40...Ne7 41.Qb8] 41.Rh6 1-0 [Predojevic]
E 97
|
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0–0 6.Be2 e5 7.0–0 Nc6 | ||||||||||
|
|
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
|
|
1 |
c51 |
Ne6 |
de6 |
ed5 |
Nd54 |
Qd5 |
Bc4 |
Rd16 |
Rd8 |
with compensationبا جبران |
|
h62 |
Be6 |
d53 |
Nfd5 |
Qd55 |
Nd5 |
Nb4 |
Rfd8 |
Rd87 | ||
|
2 |
Be3 |
Ne6 |
de6 |
Rb1 |
b5 |
b610 |
Bb6 |
Bc7 |
Qb3 |
unclear نامشخص |
|
h68 |
Be6 |
c69 |
Ne8 |
Nc7 |
ab6 |
Nc8 |
Qc7 |
b611 | ||
|
3 |
Ne6 |
de6 |
fe4 |
Nd5 |
Bf3 |
b5 |
Nf6 |
Bb7 |
Be415 |
White is superior سفید بهتر است |
|
Be6 |
fe4 |
Nc6 |
Ne412 |
Nf613 |
Ne714 |
Rf6 |
Rb8 |
| ||
1
13.Rb1 h6 14.Ne6 Be6 15.de6 fe4 16.fe4 Nc6 17.Nd5 Ng8!? 18.Bd3 [18.Qd3 Nd4 19.Qh3 Re8 20.Bg4 c6 21.Nc3 Qe7 22.b5 Kh7 and Black is slightly better; Jar.Fiala – S.Lakatos, corr.2003; 18.Be3 Nd4 and Black is slightly better; V.Annaev – K.Sakai, corr.2004] Nd4 19.Qg4
19...g5! 20.Qh3 c6 21.Ne3 Qf6 22.Ng4 Qe7 23.Be3 Ne6 and Black is slightly better; R.Ponomariov – T.Radjabov, Wijk aan Zee 2003 see 86/532;
13.a4 Ne8 unclear; A.Shneider – A.Volokitin, Alushta 2001;
13.Qb3 h6 14.Ne6 Be6 15.de6 Ne8 unclear; H.Rau – Al.Hort, Deutschland 2003
2
13...a5
a) 14.ba5 dc5! 15.a6 b6 unclear; T.Kotanjian – S.Voitsekhovsky, Saint Petersburg 2002;
b) 14.cd6! cd6 15.ba5 Qa5 16.Bd2 and White is slightly better; B.Avrukh;
13...Nh5!? unclear; A.Shneider – Efimenko, Istanbul 2003;
13...dc5!? 14.bc5 h6 15.Nh3 [15.Ne6 Be6 16.de6 Qd4 17.Qd4 ed4 18.Nb5 fe4 and Black is slightly better; Z.Gyimesi – T.Radjabov, Moscow 2005] fe4 16.fe4 Bh3 17.gh3 c6!?
3
15...Nc6? (T.Garcta – D.Christen, Internet 2003) 16.cd6 [16.Nd5!?] Qd6 [16...cd6 17.Nd5 and White is superior] 17.Qd6 cd6 18.Nb5 and White is superior; B.Avrukh
4
17.Bb2 Nb4! 18.Qb3 Nbc6 19.Nb5 a6 20.Rad1 Qb8 21.Nd6!? cd6 22.cd6 Ng8! and Black is slightly better; B.Avrukh
5
17...Nd5
a) 18.Bc4 Nb4 19.Qb3 Nc6 20.Qb7 Na5 21.Qb5 Qd4 22.Be3 Qc4 23.Qa5 Qe6 24.Qc7 Rfc8 25.Qa5 and White is slightly better;
b) 18.Qb3! c6 19.Bc4 Qe7 [19...a5 20.Bb2 and White is slightly better; Knoll – W.Uhlmann, Ansfelden 2003] 20.Bd5 [20.Bb2!? Qe6 21.Re2 with compensation, with the idea Rae1] cd5 21.Qd5 Rad8 22.Qb3 Rfe8 23.Bb2 Qe6 24.Qe6 Re6 25.Rad1 and White is slightly better; B.Avrukh
6
20.Rb1 Nc6!= Rechlis – B.Avrukh, Israel 2003 see 87/487
7
22.e7 [22.Rb1 Bf8!] Re8 23.Rb1 a5 24.a3 Nc6 25.Rb7 Re7 26.Be3 e4|; 26.Kf2 with compensation; B.Avrukh
8
13...Ne8 14.Rc1 and White is slightly better; V.Kramnik – V.Ivanchuk, Monaco (blindfold) 2000;
13...Neg8 14.c5 Bh6?! 15.ef5 gf5
16.f4! and White is slightly better; Je.Piket – Ju.Polgcr, Aruba (m/3) 1995 see 65/578; 14...Qe7 Je.Piket;
13...Bh6 14.Nf7 Rf7 15.Bh6 f4 unclear; A.Al Khateeb – T.Habermehl, corr.1997;
13...f4 14.Bf2 Ne8 unclear; I.Ivakhinova – N.Aliavdin, Serpukhov 2003;
13...Nh5!? 14.Rc1!? [14.c5 unclear] Nf4 15.Bf1 h6 [15...a5!? I.Farago] 16.Bf4 (only move) ef4 17.Ne6 Be6 18.de6 unclear; I.Farago – Hazai, Magyarorszag 2003 see 89/488
9
15...Qc8? 16.Nd5 Neg8 17.ef5 gf5 18.Qd3 and White is superior; Ch.Gokhale – Myo Zaw Min, Kuala Lumpur 1993
10
18.bc6 bc6 19.Rb7 Ne6 20.Qa4 Nd4! and Black is slightly better; R.Markus – Dembo, Budapest 2002 see 84/484
11
Dembo
12
16...Ng8 17.b5 Nd4 18.e7 Ne7 19.Bg5 Nd5 20.Bd8 Nc3 21.Qd3 Nce2 22.Re2 Ne2 23.Qe2 Rad8 24.Qe3 and White is superior; Van Wely
13
17...Ng5 18.Bg5 [18.b5!? Nf3 19.gf3; 18.Bg4!?] Qg5 19.e7 Ne7 20.Nc7 e4 21.Re4 Rf3 22.Na8 Van Wely
14
18...Nd5?! 19.bc6
a) 19...e4 20.cb7 Rb8 21.cd5 ef3 22.gf3 Ba1 [22...Be5 23.Rb1 Qh4 24.Re5 de5 25.Be3 and White is winning] 23.e7 Qe8 24.ef8Q Qf8 25.Qa4 and White is winning;
b) 19...Nb6 20.cb7 Rb8 21.c5! and White is winning; Van Wely – T.Radjabov, Khanty-Mansiysk (m/1) 2005 see 95/405;c) 19...Nc3 20.cb7 Rb8 21.Qc2 e4 22.Be4 and White is superior; Van Wely
15
Van Wely; 21.Bd5 and White is superior
|
Combining beauty and practicality, the Endgame Study is one of the unique and subtle wonders of the Royal Game. The Chess Cafe is pleased to present, on a weekly basis, a selected endgame study for your enjoyment. The Complete Studies of Genrikh Kasparyan This 300+ page softcover edition contains all known 545 studies by the one of the greatest endgame study composers of all time. Biographical information, photographs and additional material by John Roycroft supplement the studies. The result is one of the outstanding collection of endgame studies ever published. Suggested retail price is $39.95, but it is offered directly from the publisher at the special price of $24.95 ($19.95 for USCF Members!) |
| ||||||||||
فرازهايی از کلاسهای استاد بزرگ ماگراموف
استاد بزرگ المار ماگراموف در مدت اقامت در تهران علاوه بر کار انفرادی با بزرگان شطرنج کشور چند جلسه کلاس عمومی نيز برگزار کرد و همچنين در فرصتهايی موجود در مورد راهکارهای آموزش شطرنج سؤالات را پاسخ داد که فرازهايی از آنها تقديم می گردد:
- بازيکن بايد شروع بازيهای خود را از فرمهای وسط بازی انتخاب کند، بدين معنی که بازيکن بايد ببيند از کدام فرمهای پياده ای در وسط بازی خوشش می آيد سپس بگردد شروع بازيهايی انتخاب کند که بازی را به آن فرمهای وسط بازی می رساند، مثلاً بازيکنی که فرمهای پياده ايزوله وزير را دوست دارد به راحتی می تواند در شاخه های مختلف انتخابش را تعيين نمايد و قس علی هذا
- هر چند امروزه کامپيوتر دسترسی به اطلاعات را در بسياری رشته ها از جمله شطرنج تسهيل نموده است، ولی هنوز مطالعه آثار کلاسيک شطرنج برای پيشرفت شطرنج باز امری اجتناب ناپذير است، يکی از دلايل آن اين است که بازيکن وقتی آثار کلاسيک را مطالعه می کند ناخواسته دانشی فراگير از شطرنج و وضعيتها پيدا می کند، امروزه می بينيم که بسياری از بازيکنان که من باب مثال هيچگاه e4 نمی کنند و هيچگاه e4 را با e5 جواب نمی دهند، هيچ اطلاعی از گامبی شاه نداشته و خود را نيز از يادگيری آن بی نياز می بينند، در حاليکه يادگيری بسياری از فرمهای وسط بازی حاصل از دفاع هندی شاه امری ضروری برای تکميل درک يک شطرنج باز است ولی در گذشته بازيکن وقتی آثار کلاسيک شطرنج را مطالعه می کرد، خود به خود با اين وضعيتها آشنا می شد.
- يادگيری شطرنج از روی کتبی که حرکات را توضيح کامل داده اند، برای پيشرفت بازيکن بسيار ضروری است و تفاوت چشمگيری با يادگيری از روی بازيهای تفسير شده از روی کتبی نظير اينفورماتور، مجلات شطرنج امروزی، بازيهای موجود در اينترنت و يا بانکهای اطلاعاتی دارد، به عنوان مثال وقتی شما کتاب بازيهای تفسير شده باتوينيک را به قلم خود وی می خوانيد وی از علاماتی نظير" ± " استفاده صرف نکره است بلکه نوشته است در اين وضعيت سفيد به دلايلی که بيان می کند برتر است و راه تحقق بخشيدن به اين برتری را نيز در ادامه بازی نشان می دهد، بدين ترتيب درک و تکنيک بازيکن رشد می کند و شطرنج آموز پس از مطالعه کامل کتب باتوينيک می آموزد که باتوينيک چگونه در شطرنج قضاوت و عمل می کرده است و درک شطرنج باز عميقتر می شود.
- تربيت و آموزش مربی را بايست به دو گروه متفاوت تقسيم کرد، بازيکنان قدرتمندی که می خواهند مربيان خوبی شوند و مربيان با تجربه ای که می خواهند به سطوح بالای مربيگری دست يابند دسته اول طبعاً دانش شطرنجی خوبی دارند ولی روش آموختن را نمی دانند، بنابراين به اين دسته بايد شيوه آموزش شطرنج را بيشتر آموخت ولی دسته دوم مربيگری را می دانند و از مسائل روانی مربوطه به دليل اينکه سالها به اين کار پرداخته اند اطلاع دارند لذا بايد اموزش به اين گروه بيشتر متمرکز بر آموزش علم شطرنج باشد.
- مطالعه آخر بازی بايد همواره جزء مهمترين بخشهای کاری شطرنج آموز باشد زيرا در اثر مطالعه آخر بازی سطح عمومی قدرت شطرنج باز افزايش خواهد يافت و مشخصاً درک پوزيسيونی وی نيز مستقيماً بهتر می شود.
|
Dortmund R7: Vladimir Kramnik wins Super-GM
The Dortmunder Sparkassen Chess Meeting is taking place in the State Theatre (Schauspielhaus) in Dortmund, Germany, from July 29th to August 6, 2006. It is a single round robin tournament with eight players, averaging 2720 Elo and making for a category 19 event. Vladimir Kramnik vs Peter Leko was the game to watch. Naturally everyone remembered their world championship match in Brissago in 2004, in which the challenger Leko came within a hair's breadth of taking Kramnik's title (the latter won the last game to draw the match and retain his title). This was Peter's chance to win the last-round game in Dortmund, or at least to rock-solidly draw it to stay ahead of his Russian rival. The two followed a game played by Kramnik's second Evgeny Bareev against Leko's compatriot Zoltan Almasi at the Amber blindfold tournament in Monacco 2003. At move 22 Peter Leko deviated and soon found himself two pawns down. One was a dangerous passer that advanced to b7 and had to be traded for a bishop. In the endgame with an an extra piece Kramnik had little trouble and ended up taking game, set and match. Peter Svidler vs Michael Adams ended long before all of this happened. In a Closed Ruy Lopez the draw agreement came on move 17, ensuring Svidler equal first and Adams equal third. Arkadij Naiditsch vs Baadur Jobava, a classical Caro-Kann, went sour on the Georgian on move 27: Naiditsch,A (2664) - Jobava,Ba (2651) [B19] Black has defended against the mate threat on g7 by playing his bishop to g5. He is fearless of 27.f4 because he has 27...axb3 with deadly mate threats of his own. However, after White plays 27.bxa4 the black threat has disappeared and Jobava must worry about the bishop. 27...Qc6 28.f4 b4! was an option, but not what came in the game: 27...bxa4? Now White can play 28.f4 and after 28...Qb5 29.Rd3 a3 simply pick up the bishop: 30.fxg5. Unlike in his previous game Jobava played on for ten more moves before conceding that he could not survive the game a piece down. 30...axb2 31.Bxb2 Ra4 32.Qe2 Qxg5 33.Qe5 Ra5 34.Qxg5 Rxg5 35.Red1 Rxg2 36.Rd8 Rxd8 37.Rxd8+ Kh7 38.c4 Rg5 39.Bd4 e5 40.Bf2 1-0. Boris Gelfand vs Levon Aronian was a sharp, exciting battle, a beautiful game to analyse with a chess engine. Gelfand,B (2729) - Aronian,L (2761) [E15] 14...Qc8. Aronian wants to turn this into a sharp tactical fight, where he believes he has an edge on the older, more positionally oriented Boris Gelfand. 15.Kb1. 15.axb4 cxb4 leaves the black queen x-raying the white king with very dangerous consequences. 15...a5 16.Ne5 Re8 17.Rhe1 Bf8 18.g4 g6 19.Bg3 Re6 20.f4 d6 21.Nxc6 Nxc6. The knight has been dangling on b4 for six moves. Gelfand has taken up the tactical challenge and is doing very well in this sharp position. 22.Nb5 Ne8. Now watch Gelfand finish off his young colleague from Armenia: 23.e5 dxe5 24.Bd5 a4 25.fxe5 Ng7 26.Qf3 Rb8 27.Nd6 Bxd6 28.exd6 Nd4 29.Rxd4 Rxe1+ 30.Bxe1 cxd4 31.Qxf7+ Kh8 32.d7 Qc5 33.Bb4 1-0. Kramnik's performance in this event was 2818, exactly the same as Peter Svidler, Adams, Leko, Gelfand and even Arkadij Naiditsch scored above their expectation and can expect to win rating points in the next FIDE list. They take the points from the two big losers of the event, Levon Aronian and Baadur Jobava, who performed at levels of 2555 and 2505 repectively. Quite traumatic for these bright young talents. The women's match between the best female players in the US and Germany, Irina Krush and Elisabeth Pähtz, ended in a narrow victory for the US lady, who won her fifth round game. All others were drawn. Photos: Dagobert Kohlmeyer | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Dortmunder Sparkassen Chess Meeting is taking place in the State Theatre (Schauspielhaus) in Dortmund, Germany, from July 29th to August 6, 2006. It is a single round robin tournament with eight players, averaging 2720 Elo and making for a category 19 event. Peter Leko vs Boris Gelfand was a Sicilian Scheveningen, which ended after multiple exchanges in a 24-move draw. Michael Adams vs Arkadij Naiditsch saw the British GM on the attack, but his German counterpart defending well and finally liquidating to a 32-move draw. Levon Aronian vs Peter Svidler was a Grünfeld, in which the experienced St Petersburg GM wrapped everything up to an endgame with an extra pawn and same-colored bishops, enough to force the resignation of his Armenian opponent on move 47. Baadur Jobava vs Vladimir Kramnik was the talk of the day. On move 14 the classical chess world champion, playing with the black pieces, sprung a little trap, and one move later his young Georgian opponent resigned. Stunning! Jobava,Baadur (2651) - Kramnik,Vladimir (2743) White's last move allows Kramnik to spring a little trap: 14...Nxb4! 15.axb4 Ne4 and now, to the amazement of the kibitzers on Playchess.com (and, we assume, Dortmund, Paris, New York and the rest of the world) Jobava resigned. Black is clearly better after this piece sacrifice, though we cannot quickly explain why it justifies White's resignation. Much more lopsided positions have been played out by GMs of this calibre. Here, for what it is worth, is part of the discussion that took place on Playchess.com, with the spectators all equipped with the latest and fastest chess engines. 15...Ne4 Deep Junior 10: 1) 16.Rd3 (Deep Junior 10: 2) 16.Bd2 Bxb4 17.Rc1 Nxd2 18.Qxd2 Qc5 19.Ng1 Rfd8 20.Qe3 Qxe3+ 21.fxe3 Rac8 22.Nge2 Rc4 -1.55/16 ; Deep Junior 10: 3) 16.Rc1 Bxb4 -1.48/6 ; Deep Shredder 10: 1) 16.Rd3 Bxb4 17.Bd2 Qc5 18.Re3 Rfd8 19.Bd3 Nxc3 20.Bxh7+ Kf8 21.0-0 Rac8 -2.09/15 ; Deep Shredder 10: 2) 16.Rd4 Qxc3+ 17.Qxc3 Nxc3 18.Bd2 Ne4 19.Bd3 Nxd2 20.Kxd2 Rfd8 21.Rxd8+ -2.26/15 ; Deep Shredder 10: 3) 16.Bd2 Bxb4 17.Rc1 Nxd2 18.Nxd2 Qc5 19.Be2 Rac8 20.Ndb1 Qd5 21.Bf3 Qxe5+ 22.Qe2 Rxc3 23.Nxc3 Bxc3+ 24.Kf1 Bxf3 25.Qxf3 Rc8 -2.24/14 ) 16...Bxb4 17.Bd2 Qc5 18.Re3 Nxd2 19.Nxd2 Rac8 20.Ndb1 Rfd8 21.h4 Bd5 22.Rhh3 -1.24/16. [Click to replay]. In the women's match Irina Krush of the US drew first blood by defeating Elisabeth Pähtz with the black peces.
SPARKASSEN
CHESS MEETING
2006
July 28 to August 6, 2006Round six report
Round 6: Saturday, August 5, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Peter Svidler
Michael Adams
Arkadij Naiditsch
Baadur Jobava
Vladimir Kramnik
Peter Leko
Boris Gelfand
Sparkassen Chess-Meeting Dortmund (6), 05.08.2006
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.Nc3 Bb7 5.a3 d5 6.cxd5 Nxd5 7.Bd2 Nf6 8.Qc2 c5 9.dxc5 Bxc5 10.b4 Be7 11.e4 Nc6 12.Bf4 0-0 13.Rd1 Qc8 14.e5.
Standings after six rounds
Full Schedule and Results
Round 1: Saturday, July 29, 15:00h
Michael Adams
Levon Aronian
Baadur Jobava
Peter Svidler
Peter Leko
Arkadij Naiditsch
Boris Gelfand
Vladimir Kramnik
Round 2: Sunday, July 30, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Vladimir Kramnik
Arkadij Naiditsch
Boris Gelfand
Peter Svidler
Peter Leko
Michael Adams
Baadur Jobava
Round 3: Tuesday, August 1, 15:00h
Baadur Jobava
Levon Aronian
Peter Leko
Michael Adams
Boris Gelfand
Peter Svidler
Vladimir Kramnik
Arkadij Naiditsch
Round 4: Wednesday, August 2, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Arkadij Naiditsch
Peter Svidler
Vladimir Kramnik
Michael Adams
Boris Gelfand
Baadur Jobava
Peter Leko
Round 5: Friday, August 4, 15:00h
Peter Leko
Levon Aronian
Boris Gelfand
Baadur Jobava
Vladimir Kramnik
Michael Adams
Arkadij Naiditsch
Peter Svidler
Round 6: Saturday, August 5, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Peter Svidler
Michael Adams
Arkadij Naiditsch
Baadur Jobava
Vladimir Kramnik
Peter Leko
Boris Gelfand
Round 7: Sunday, August 6, 13:00h
Boris Gelfand
Levon Aronian
Vladimir Kramnik
Peter Leko
Arkadij Naiditsch
Baadur Jobava
Peter Svidler
Michael Adams
Games – ReportLinks
The Dortmunder Sparkassen Chess Meeting is taking place in the State Theatre (Schauspielhaus) in Dortmund, Germany, from July 29th to August 6, 2006. It is a single round robin tournament with eight players, averaging 2720 Elo and making for a category 19 event. Vladimir Kramnik vs Michael Adams was a Petroff which at some stage looked like it would be very long and very tense, with Kramnik grinding out a win. However the game ended after 41 moves with a draw. Arkadij Naiditsch vs Peter Svidler, a closed Ruy Lopez, was hard fought, lasting almost six hours and ending in a queen and three pawns vs queen and two which White could not win. Naiditsch is playing what most spectators consider the most enterprising chess in Dortmund. Peter Leko vs Levon Aronian was an Exchange Ruy with an eighth move novelty by Leko. The result was a blocked position in which both sides shuffled their pieces during a protracted middlegame phase. Aronian was intent on holding on to a draw, Leko was casting around for more. On move 55 he exchanged knights and simplified to a rook and pawns ending which Aronian could not hold. The game ended on move 63 with the second victory in this tournament for Hungary's top GM, giving him the sole leadership in the cross tables. Boris Gelfand vs Baadur Jobava was a marathon encounter lasting six hours and forty-five minutes, coming immediately after his 7½ hour loss (to Michael Adams) which Gelfand had to endure yesterday. But he proved that a 38-year-old world class grandmaster can have world class stamina. Gelfand,B (2729) - Jobava,Ba (2651) [B39] Gelfand has liquidated to a pure pawn ending he believes he can win. 47.Kd4 Kc6 48.Ke5 Kd7 49.f4 Ke8 50.h4 h5 51.f5 f6+ 52.Ke6 gxf5. This is where computers, equipped with the ruthless perfection of their endgame databases, jump into action. After a second or two of thought and five hundred consultations of the tablebases Fritz announces that 53.e5! is mate in 69 moves. Terrifying. 53.e5! Boris found it in a couple of minutes and without access to the preprocessed analysis of hundreds of millions of positions. 53...fxe5 54.Kxe5 Kd7 55.Kxf5 Kd6 56.Kg5 Ke5 57.Kxh5 Kf4 58.Kg6 e5 59.h5 e4 60.h6 e3 61.h7 e2 62.h8Q e1Q. Perfectly played, says Fritz, wondering how on earth human beings can do it. The above position is mate in 59, and belongs to the most difficult five-piece endings. Against the perfect defence of a computer probably no human being (except of course John Nunn) would be able to win the full point, but of course Gelfand is facing another human being, whose defence is as weak or strong as Gelfand's attack. We put in some notes by the silicon oracle not to disparage the performance of the players, but to show how complex and incomprehensible these endgames are. Exclamation points indicate that the move played is the only one that wins in the given position. 63.Qb8+! Kg4 64.Qc8+! Kg3 65.Qh3+! Kf4 66.Qf5+ Kg3 67.Qh3+ Kf4 68.Qf3+! Ke5 69.g4! Kd4 70.g5! Qe8+ 71.Kg7 Qe7+ 72.Kh6 Kc4 73.Qf4+ Kb5? Bad defence, says Fritz. After 73...Kb3 White needs 47 moves to mate, now it is just 32 moves. 74.g6 Qe6 75.Kg5 Qe7+ 76.Kg4 Qg7 77.Qd6? More criticism from the database: 77.Qf5+ mates in 30, Gelfand's move increases it to 47. 77...Ka4 78.Kf5 Qc3 79.Qe5. The last moves have brought no improvement, and 79.Qe5 moves the win to 58 moves. 79...Qh3+ 80.Kg5 Qg2+ 81.Kf5 Qh3+ 82.Kf6 Qf3+ 83.Qf5 Qc3+. This is quite typical of the endgame. At move 62 it was 59 moves to win, now it is 58. And White must find 84.Qe5 to achieve even this. The only other move that wins is 84.Kf7, which would require 68 more moves. In the game White plays neither: 84.Kg5? Now the position is a theoretical draw. 84...Ka3 85.Qf8+ Ka4? Now it is mate in 59 again. Black should have played 85...Kb3 or 85...Ka2 to keep the draw. 86.Qa8+? The position is drawn again, White needed to find 86.Kg4! (only move to win). 86...Kb4 87.Qb7+ Ka5? Mate in 36. If Black had played 87...Ka3! the position would still be a draw. 88.g7 Qe5+ 89.Kg6 Qe6+ 90.Kh7 Qf5+ 91.Kg8 Ka4. What would you play in this position? Hint: there are only two moves that win for White. We would like to once again stress that we are not criticizing the play of the two GMs, but merely demonstrating the complexity of this endgame. Some day, maybe, computers will annotate games as follows: 1.e4 e6?? Allows mate in 23 million moves. 1...e5, 1...d5 or 1...a6 was required to hold the draw. 92.Qh1? Draw again. 92.Qa7+ wins in 35, 92.Qe7 wins in 39 moves. 92...Qc8+? Black needed to find 92...Kb3 or 92...Ka3 to hold on. Now it is mate in 32 moves. 93.Kh7 Qf5+ 94.Kh8 Qe5 95.Qh3 Qd4 96.Qe6 Qh4+ 97.Kg8 Qf4 98.Qd5 Ka3 99.Kh7 Qh4+ 100.Kg6 Qg3+ 101.Kf7 Qf4+ 102.Ke8. White has not allowed his opponent to escape into a theoretical draw, but it is still 32 moves to mate. 102...Qb8+ 103.Qd8. Now it is 45 moves. 103...Qb5+ 104.Qd7 Qh5+ (31 moves left) 105.Kf8 Qf3+ 106.Ke7 Qe4+ 107.Qe6 Qb7+ (22 moves) 108.Kf6 Qf3+ 109.Kg5 Qg3+ 110.Qg4 Qe5+ 111.Kh4 Qf6+ 112.Qg5 Qd4+ 113.Kh3 and Black resigned, 14 moves before mate. For those of you who are still awake, here is an "optimum" continuation: 113...114.Kh2 Qe6 115.g8Q Qe2+ 116.Qg2 Qh5+ 117.Qh3+ Qxh3+ 118.Kxh3 Kb4 119.Qd5 Kc3 120.Kg3 Kb2 121.Qc4 Ka1 122.Qb5 Ka2 123.Kf2 Ka1 124.Ke3 Ka2 125.Kd2 Ka1 126.Kc1 Ka2 127.Qa4 mate. [Click to replay] The above endgame is particularly interesting because there has been a fair amount of human analysis done on the endgame queen and g-pawn vs queen. This resulted from an endgame that appeared in practical play and was deeply analysed by the great endgame expert André Chéron. Botvinnik,Mikhail - Minev,Nikolay N [D47] Here the tablebases tell us that White must play 77.Kg4 for a mate in 60 moves (or 77.Kg5/Kh4/Kh6 or 77.Qf3/Qf2/Qd3 for slightly longer mates). But Botvinnik played 77.Qf4+? which allows Black to escape with a draw. Chéron showed that the best defensive strategy for Black is, somewhat incredibly, to move his king to the square a1. So Minev's reply in the game, 77...Ka5?, is a deadly mistake and allows White to win again, now in 35 moves. Botvinnik did it with 78.Qd2+ Ka4 79.Qd4+ Ka5 80.Kg5 Qe7+ 81.Kf5 Qf8+ 82.Ke4 Qh6 83.Qe5+ Ka4 84.g7 Qh1+ 85.Kd4 Qd1+ 86.Kc5 Qc1+ 87.Kd6 Qd2+ 88.Ke6 Qa2+ 89.Qd5 Qe2+ 90.Kd6 Qh2+ 91.Kc5 1-0. [Click to replay] If you replay the Gelfand-Jobava game you will see that the errors seem to arise when Black fails to move his king in the right direction, towards the square a1 – and when White almost forces him to do so. Moving the black king to a1, or preventing it from getting there, is one of the few strategies that are comprehensible to human beings. Unfortunately the endgame database just provide us with the best moves in any given position, but are unable to give reasons for the choice. Fritz may play the endgame with absolute perfection, but if you ask it why a certain move must be played its only answer is "because that's what it says in the list" (of hundreds of millions of positions).
SPARKASSEN
CHESS MEETING
2006
July 28 to August 6, 2006Round five report
Round 5: Friday, August 4, 15:00h
Peter Leko
Levon Aronian
Boris Gelfand
Baadur Jobava
Vladimir Kramnik
Michael Adams
Arkadij Naiditsch
Peter Svidler
Games – Report
Sparkassen Dortmund GER (5), 04.08.2006
1.Nf3 c5 2.c4 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 g6 5.e4 Bg7 6.Be3 Nf6 7.Nc3 Ng4 8.Qxg4 Nxd4 9.Qd1 Ne6 10.Rc1 Qa5 11.Be2 b6 12.Qd5 Rb8 13.Qxa5 bxa5 14.b3 Bd4 15.Bd2 d6 16.0-0 Bc5 17.Na4 Ba3 18.Rb1 Bb7 19.f3 Bc6 20.Bxa5 Bxa4 21.bxa4 Kd7 22.Rfd1 Nc5 23.Bc3 Rhc8 24.a5 Na4 25.Be1 Nb2 26.Rdc1 Bb4 27.Bf2 Bxa5 28.c5 dxc5 29.Rxc5 Rxc5 30.Bxc5 Bc3 31.a4 Ke6 32.Bb5 Kf6 33.Rc1 a6 34.Rxc3 axb5 35.a5 Ke6 36.Rb3 Na4 37.Be3 Kd7 38.a6 Ra8 39.Rxb5 Rxa6 40.Bd4 Rd6 41.Rb7+ Kd8 42.Rb4 Ra6 43.Kf2 Kc7 44.Ke3 Nb6 45.Bxb6+ Rxb6 46.Rxb6 Kxb6
Amsterdam ol (Men) fin-A Amsterdam (5), 17.09.1954
Additional information
Standings after five rounds
Full Schedule and Results
Round 1: Saturday, July 29, 15:00h
Michael Adams
Levon Aronian
Baadur Jobava
Peter Svidler
Peter Leko
Arkadij Naiditsch
Boris Gelfand
Vladimir Kramnik
Round 2: Sunday, July 30, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Vladimir Kramnik
Arkadij Naiditsch
Boris Gelfand
Peter Svidler
Peter Leko
Michael Adams
Baadur Jobava
Round 3: Tuesday, August 1, 15:00h
Baadur Jobava
Levon Aronian
Peter Leko
Michael Adams
Boris Gelfand
Peter Svidler
Vladimir Kramnik
Arkadij Naiditsch
Round 4: Wednesday, August 2, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Arkadij Naiditsch
Peter Svidler
Vladimir Kramnik
Michael Adams
Boris Gelfand
Baadur Jobava
Peter Leko
Round 5: Friday, August 4, 15:00h
Peter Leko
Levon Aronian
Boris Gelfand
Baadur Jobava
Vladimir Kramnik
Michael Adams
Arkadij Naiditsch
Peter Svidler
Games – Report
Round 6: Saturday, August 5, 15:00h
Levon Aronian
Peter Svidler
Michael Adams
Arkadij Naiditsch
Baadur Jobava
Vladimir Kramnik
Peter Leko
Boris Gelfand
Games – Report
Round 7: Sunday, August 6, 13:00h
Boris Gelfand
Levon Aronian
Vladimir Kramnik
Peter Leko
Arkadij Naiditsch
Baadur Jobava
Peter Svidler
Michael Adams
Games – ReportLinks
